Future branch status

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 14:42:12 UTC 2012


On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 April 2012 23:54, Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
>>> Peter,
>>>
>>
>>> I get alot of errors when compiling for x86_64 (i.e. 64bit), e.g.:
>>>
>>> libc/misc/dirent/versionsort.c:16:1: warning: return type defaults to
>>> 'int' [enabled by default]
>>> libc/misc/dirent/versionsort.c:16:1: warning: function declaration
>>> isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
>>
>> means, your headers do not provide a prototype for versionsort()
>
> No, it was a typo in the macro name (see surplus 's' in other mail in
> this thread).
> fixed.
>
>> fcntl is a special case, not comparable with the other X64() functions (at least in uClibc), this case can be discussed on ml if you want to.
>
> Yes, i know. I think the correct guard is
> #if defined __UCLIBC_HAS_LFS__ && __WORDSIZE == 32 && !defined __NR_fcntl64
> fixed.
>
> missing comma for ppc32 in posix_fadvise.c -- fixed.
>
> Another question, on powerpc, i see:
>
> Makefile.in:139: warning: overriding commands for target
> `include/bits/local_lim.h'
> libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/Makefile.commonarch:202:
> warning: ignoring old commands for target `include/bits/local_lim.h'
>
> Can you advise on this on, please?

Bernhard

Be aware that the patches that are eliminated only make it work
on x86 other architectures are still regressing so do first find
the offending patches that cause this.


More information about the uClibc mailing list