Future branch status

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 17:42:18 UTC 2012


On 23 April 2012 18:12, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 19:36, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's leave this out for the merge and look at it after the merge
>>> (unless you can fix it for the failing arches), ok?
>>>
>>> I'm going through the other commits during the weekend (I have a few
>>> remarks).
>>>
>>
>> Yes thats a good plan I think. However there are some cleanup fixes that
>> are sort of obvious and some bug fixes that we can safely take after testing

http://uclibc.org/~aldot/uClibc/psm-future.tar.gz (300k, I'm now about
to start a little bit of testing)

> My notes so far:
>
> include/sched.h: remove __clone{,2}
> libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c: vis of __uclibc_progname? Why not hidden?
>                                   : _dl_skip_args only for SH ?!
> libc/misc/internals/tempname.h: __gen_tempname duplicated in nptl.. vis public?
> libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/posix_fadvise.c: __NR___syscall_arm_fadvise64_64 ?
> "[PATCH 382/408] linuxthreads: use __UCLIBC_HAS_TLS__ consistently" impossible
>        impossible combo for __resp
> syslog.c: disable locking in setlogmask (why?)
> pread_write.c: endianess broken? if so use __LONG_LONG_PAIR() !
>
> Care to comment?
>
> TIA,


More information about the uClibc mailing list