Future branch status

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 16:12:58 UTC 2012


On 21 April 2012 19:36, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Let's leave this out for the merge and look at it after the merge
>> (unless you can fix it for the failing arches), ok?
>>
>> I'm going through the other commits during the weekend (I have a few
>> remarks).
>>
>
> Yes thats a good plan I think. However there are some cleanup fixes that
> are sort of obvious and some bug fixes that we can safely take after testing

My notes so far:

include/sched.h: remove __clone{,2}
libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c: vis of __uclibc_progname? Why not hidden?
                                   : _dl_skip_args only for SH ?!
libc/misc/internals/tempname.h: __gen_tempname duplicated in nptl.. vis public?
libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/posix_fadvise.c: __NR___syscall_arm_fadvise64_64 ?
"[PATCH 382/408] linuxthreads: use __UCLIBC_HAS_TLS__ consistently" impossible
	impossible combo for __resp
syslog.c: disable locking in setlogmask (why?)
pread_write.c: endianess broken? if so use __LONG_LONG_PAIR() !

Care to comment?

TIA,


More information about the uClibc mailing list