Future branch status
raj.khem at gmail.com
Thu Apr 19 19:51:47 UTC 2012
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
> which 3 patches produce the regressions?
The real problem is in first one other two are just dependent on it.
so they are removed but first one shows up the real problem.
> Is the arm/mips/ppc problem an endianness only problem (does it work on LE but not on BE)?
arm is LE other two are BE
> Thanks, Peter
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:45:22 -0700
>> Von: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> An: uClibc list <uclibc at uclibc.org>
>> CC: Peter Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net>
>> Betreff: Future branch status
>> I have been trying to sanitize future branch and keep it rebased on
>> top of master
>> however the branch does introduce regressions. I have identified 3 patches
>> lets me boot x11 image on x86 and x86_64 but arm, mips and ppc are still a
>> no go
>> it boots into console fine but not the x11 image which otherwise boots
>> fine on top
>> of current master so I consider this as a regression.
>> The branch however does have some interesting fixes. So I am going to
>> merge the
>> bug fixes and trivial fixes first and primarily which dont regress.
>> My tree is here
>> which is future branch rebased on top of master.
> NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
> Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
More information about the uClibc