[PATCH V2 8/8] MIPS: Fix more *_NONBLOCK definitions

Kevin Cernekee cernekee at gmail.com
Sat Apr 7 21:22:19 UTC 2012

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>> After seeing a problem report involving one of the O_NONBLOCK
>> "derivatives," I looked through the tree to see what else might be
>> affected.  Here is what I found:
> We already have this kind of patch in future branch IIRC

I think TFD_NONBLOCK and IN_NONBLOCK are still missing on both master
and future?

More information about the uClibc mailing list