MIPS NPTL patches
Dan E
trg_info at mailhaven.com
Thu Apr 9 09:42:02 UTC 2009
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:43 +0200, "Carmelo AMOROSO"
<carmelo.amoroso at st.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 April 2009 10:27:44 pm Dan E wrote:
> >> OK, I lied. There are 4 patches in all for this set.
> >>
> >> I could not get a clean build without these changes.
> >
> > what error messages do you get without this patch ?
> >
> >> A better way would be nice.
> >> No other arch needs these to build the NPTL branch, do they? MIPS shouldn't
> >> either, but I don't know how to do it gracefully. Tips, flames, etc. all
> >> welcome and encouraged.
>
> Indeed, ARM ans sh4 are working without this multiple inclusions.
> They will not applied to common code unless clearly explained.
>
> Carmelo
Please see my reply to Khem. These includes are not needed and this
patch should definitely not be applied. Brain fart on my part. I
cannot now reproduce the errors that led me to make those changes.
Perhaps a problem with my toolchain headers, but definitely a mistake on
my part.
DanE
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service?
More information about the uClibc
mailing list