MIPS NPTL patches

Dan E trg_info at mailhaven.com
Thu Apr 9 09:42:02 UTC 2009


On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:43 +0200, "Carmelo AMOROSO"
<carmelo.amoroso at st.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 April 2009 10:27:44 pm Dan E wrote:
> >> OK, I lied.  There are 4 patches in all for this set.
> >>
> >> I could not get a clean build without these changes. 
> > 
> > what error messages do you get without this patch ?
> > 
> >> A better way would be nice.
> >> No other arch needs these to build the NPTL branch, do they?  MIPS shouldn't
> >> either, but I don't know how to do it gracefully.  Tips, flames, etc. all
> >> welcome and encouraged.
> 
> Indeed, ARM ans sh4 are working without this multiple inclusions.
> They will not applied to common code unless clearly explained.
> 
> Carmelo

Please see my reply to Khem.  These includes are not needed and this
patch should definitely not be applied.  Brain fart on my part.  I
cannot now reproduce the errors that led me to make those changes. 
Perhaps a problem with my toolchain headers, but definitely a mistake on
my part.

DanE

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service?



More information about the uClibc mailing list