[uClibc-cvs] uClibc/docs Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt,1.12,1.13

Manuel Novoa III mjn3 at uclibc.org
Mon Sep 22 05:43:47 UTC 2003


Update of /var/cvs/uClibc/docs
In directory winder:/tmp/cvs-serv30158

Modified Files:
	Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt 
Log Message:
One more scanf difference.


Index: Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/uClibc/docs/Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -d -r1.12 -r1.13
--- Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt	22 Sep 2003 03:29:37 -0000	1.12
+++ Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt	22 Sep 2003 05:43:44 -0000	1.13
@@ -140,6 +140,10 @@
 9) The FILEs created by glibc's fmemopen(), open_memstream(), and fopencookie()
    are not capable of wide orientation.  The corresponding uClibc routines do
    not have this limitation.
+10) For scanf, the C99 standard states "The fscanf function returns the value of
+    the macro EOF if an input failure occurs before any conversion."  But glibc's
+    scanf does not respect conversions for which assignment was surpressed, even
+    though the standard states that the value is converted but not stored.
 
 glibc bugs that Ulrich Drepper has refused to acknowledge or comment on
   ( http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/ )




More information about the uClibc-cvs mailing list