[uClibc-cvs] uClibc/docs/uclibc.org FAQ.html, 1.15, 1.16 index.html, 1.68, 1.69
Erik Andersen
andersen at uclibc.org
Tue Sep 9 10:02:34 UTC 2003
Update of /var/cvs/uClibc/docs/uclibc.org
In directory winder:/tmp/cvs-serv31560/docs/uclibc.org
Modified Files:
FAQ.html index.html
Log Message:
Yet more trivial doc updates
Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/uClibc/docs/uclibc.org/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.68
retrieving revision 1.69
diff -u -d -r1.68 -r1.69
--- index.html 9 Sep 2003 09:07:10 -0000 1.68
+++ index.html 9 Sep 2003 10:02:31 -0000 1.69
@@ -47,14 +47,17 @@
just recompiling the source code. uClibc even supports shared libraries
and threading. It currently runs on <a href="http://kernel.org/">standard Linux</a>
and <a href="http://www.uclinux.org">MMU-less (also known as µClinux)</a>
-systems with support for alpha, ARM, i386, i960, h8300, m68k, mips/mipsel,
+systems with support for alpha, ARM, cris, i386, i960, h8300, m68k, mips/mipsel,
PowerPC, SH, SPARC, and v850 processors.
<p>
-If you are building an embedded Linux system and you find that glibc is
-eating up too much space, you should consider using uClibc. If you are
-building a huge fileserver with 12 Terabytes of storage, than using
-glibc may be a better choice...
+If you are building an embedded Linux system and you find that
+glibc is eating up too much space, you should consider using
+uClibc. If you are building a huge fileserver with 12 Terabytes
+of storage, then using glibc may make more sense. Unless, for
+example, that 12 Terabytes will be Network Attached Storage and
+you plan to burn Linux into the system's firmware...
+
<p>
uClibc is maintained by
Index: FAQ.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/uClibc/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -d -r1.15 -r1.16
--- FAQ.html 7 Sep 2003 05:30:52 -0000 1.15
+++ FAQ.html 9 Sep 2003 10:02:30 -0000 1.16
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@
</TD></TR>
<TR><TD BGCOLOR="#eeeee0">
- Currently uClibc runs on alpha, ARM, i386, i960, h8300, m68k, mips/mipsel,
- PowerPC, SH, SPARC, and v850 processors.
+ Currently uClibc runs on alpha, ARM, cris, h8300, i386, i960, m68k,
+ mips/mipsel, PowerPC, SH, SPARC, and v850 processors.
<p>
@@ -166,10 +166,12 @@
<p>
- If you are trying to build a huge fileserver for your company that will
- have 12 Terabytes of storage, then using glibc may make more sense.
- Unless, for example, that 12 Terabytes will be Network Attached Storage
- and you plan to burn Linux into the system's firmware...
+ If you are building an embedded Linux system and you find that
+ glibc is eating up too much space, you should consider using
+ uClibc. If you are building a huge fileserver with 12 Terabytes
+ of storage, then using glibc may make more sense. Unless, for
+ example, that 12 Terabytes will be Network Attached Storage and
+ you plan to burn Linux into the system's firmware...
More information about the uClibc-cvs
mailing list