[uClibc-cvs] uClibc/docs Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt,1.8,1.9
Erik Andersen
andersen at uclibc.org
Fri Apr 25 09:09:59 UTC 2003
Update of /var/cvs/uClibc/docs
In directory winder:/tmp/cvs-serv23150/docs
Modified Files:
Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt
Log Message:
Comment on glibc's MALLOC_CHECK_ support.
Index: Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/uClibc/docs/Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -d -r1.8 -r1.9
--- Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt 12 Feb 2003 13:09:59 -0000 1.8
+++ Glibc_vs_uClibc_Differences.txt 25 Apr 2003 09:09:56 -0000 1.9
@@ -24,6 +24,14 @@
This difference also applies to realloc(NULL, 0). I personally feel glibc's
behavior is not particularly safe.
+4.1) glibc's malloc() implementation has behavior that is tunable via the
+MALLOC_CHECK_ environment variable. This is primarily used to provide extra
+malloc debugging features. These extended malloc debugging features are not
+available within uClibc. There are many good malloc debugging libraries
+available for Linux (dmalloc, electric fence, valgrind, etc) that work much
+better than the glibc extended malloc debugging. So our omitting this
+functionality from uClibc is not a great loss.
+
5) uClibc does not provide a database library (libdb).
6) uClibc does not support NSS (/lib/libnss_*), which allows glibc to easily
More information about the uClibc-cvs
mailing list