Notice of MIT License violation by Roberto Foglietta
Kang-Che Sung
explorer09 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 05:54:46 UTC 2026
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 5:49 AM Jody Bruchon via busybox
<busybox at busybox.net> wrote:
>
> This email is official notice of violation of the terms of the MIT License. The following change removes legally mandatory copyright notices and the code in violation is being publicly distributed:
>
> https://github.com/robang74/busybox/commit/97e3b97e616e72ca4224dcbdaffd41474bea5ca8
>
I'm not a lawyer, but I think it's good to inform you that the MIT
license does not require attribution in generated binaries. You can
read the license text carefully and confirm that yourself.
It's not to be confused with the 3-clause BSD license.
Roberto only removed the copyright notice in the program output, while
keeping the copyright notice and the MIT license text *in the source*
intact. AFAIK, it's legal (even though it's a bad idea in ethics).
More information about the busybox
mailing list