[PATCH] libbb: rename two fields in ioloop_state, no logic changes

[Roberto A. Foglietta]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 21:22, Victor Erminpour <victor at erminpour.com> wrote:
>
> HI all,
>
> Please forgive the additional incorrect patches sent, the patch I meant to send
> was the first one:
> [PATCH] tc: make CBQ support optional and isolate legacy code
>
> I was having issues with building for RISC-V with a newer kernel (>=6.3).
> Please include it if you find it useful.

Irrelevant (especially the post-hoc explanation) as previously said.

>
> I'm a big fan of the busybox project, thanks for all the great work!
>

Nobody put in discussion the value of the work and contributors, in fact:

https://github.com/robang74/busybox/blob/master/NEWS

The problem arises when people who never contribute speak for those
who did without considering the consequences of their words for other
people involved.


On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 21:29, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
<guille.rodriguez at gmail.com> wrote:
>

> There is no “the git I would like to be”.  I am talking about the official upstream repository.

+:git-shell:uchaosys:busybox> grep guille.rodriguez AUTHORS
(nothing)
+:git-shell:uchaosys:busybox> grep guille.rodriguez NEWS
(nothing)

Participation on this list has no prerequisite, as we can see. Please
keep in consideration this aspect and the word "qualify" I have used
properly in this thread.

Best regards, R-