Patches to make GNU gzip and BusyBox gzip produce identical compression results
email at esotericnonsense.com
Tue Sep 3 10:29:42 UTC 2019
I split out the third patch for this reason. I agree, it can be dropped
if people see no need for it. Adding a compile-time option I think is
On 03/09/2019 04.31, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
>> From 12d30559486502feec4e2821b3ab45ae6139e7aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Daniel Edgecumbe <git at esotericnonsense.com>
>> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:09:15 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] gzip: set default compression level to 6 when
>> With this change, GNU gzip -n and BusyBox gzip now produce identical output
>> assuming that CONFIG_GZIP_FAST=2.
> Excuse me, but I wonder one thing on the third patch: Why should we follow
> strictly with gzip on the no-options default behavior? gzip -9 is quite fast
> in modern processors, and if someone builds busybox without
> CONFIG_FEATURE_GZIP_LEVELS, I think they are moke likely to stick with -9 as
> default instead of -6.
> The better change would be to allow the builder to choose the compression level
> at build time. It would be better to resolve the debate on which level should
> be the default, Otherwise, I think the third patch can be dropped.
Daniel Edgecumbe | esotericnonsense
Kalix NO, Sverige | +358 46 584 2810
email at esotericnonsense.com | https://esotericnonsense.com
More information about the busybox