[PATCH 1/3] platform: fix missing strchrnul
Matthias Andree
mandree at FreeBSD.org
Wed Nov 27 21:13:37 UTC 2013
Am 27.11.2013 12:14, schrieb Daniel Borca:
>
>
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>>
>> The whole #ifdef approach is massively broken and prone to mis-guess.
>>
>> It denies one of the most basic considerations, and that is: operating
>> systems change over time, and add features missing from earlier
>> versions. Looking at the operating system is insufficient.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Note I am not saying you need to use a fully-fledged autoconf approach,
>> lighter-weight alternatives have been seen in the wild, and possibly it
>> suffices - for FreeBSD - to have a separate header (.h) file that checks
>> the major FreeBSD version and #defines a few HAVE_SOMEFUNCTION or leaves
>> it #undef'd, so the actual code can then
>
> That just means the cpp dancing is moved elsewhere. Someone needs to
> maintain that header, because OSes <quote> change over time </quote>.
The point is to autodetect, somehow, what the OS features and what it is
missing, and go with that.
>> on his hands, so some concept similar to autoconf might work in more
>> places with less human work and more machine work during the build.
>
> I agree, autoconf is the best approach. But *someone* needs to write
> it.
I have not claimed autoconf to be the best approach, nor would I.
I am not writing such an autoconfiguration feature either, merely
restating the recurring finding that guessing symbols from OS predefined
macros is doomed.
More information about the busybox
mailing list