Suggested modification/extension of beep

[Rob Landley]

On Friday 19 February 2010 17:54:57 Cathey, Jim wrote:
> Regarding beep producing ponies, I don't want it at all in fact.
> The only reason I even threw out the suggestion is because of the
> use example where it ran 'indefinitely' producing pseudo-music.
> In which case I think command-line arguments start to fall down
> a bit.  I only wanted to provoke discussion on the topic, I figured
> the 'correct' design would fall out of that.
>
> -- Jim

I would like to clarify that I'm not actually _against_ producing ponies via 
software.

Just FYI.

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds