[PATCH 2/2] (g)unzip: Optimize inflate_codes()
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Sat Feb 13 20:37:06 UTC 2010
On Saturday 13 February 2010 13:48:34 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> and how does this relate to my patch?
That there's not much point micro-optimizing something if it should instead be
replaced?
You earlier mentioned just a straight port of either the zlib or the kernel
implementation to busybox, replacing what we've got. If the current busybox
version is measurably inferior, that sounds worth a look.
What I don't know is what the code size difference would be...
> Jocke
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
More information about the busybox
mailing list