[PATCH 2/2] (g)unzip: Optimize inflate_codes()

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Sat Feb 13 20:37:06 UTC 2010


On Saturday 13 February 2010 13:48:34 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> and how does this relate to my patch?

That there's not much point micro-optimizing something if it should instead be 
replaced?

You earlier mentioned just a straight port of either the zlib or the kernel 
implementation to busybox, replacing what we've got.  If the current busybox 
version is measurably inferior, that sounds worth a look.

What I don't know is what the code size difference would be...

>  Jocke

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds


More information about the busybox mailing list