Windows port?

[Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy]

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 April 2010 11:37:45 Cathey, Jim wrote:
>> I would _really_ hate
>> to see them all crapped up with half-implemented junk that let
>> them build anyway, but didn't even try to let them run correctly.
>> That's like painting over rot.
>
> +1
>
> Making busybox work under mingw or on Gnu/Hurd/Dammit strikes me as sort of
> pointless, but if somebody's interested then somebody's interested.
>
> However, crapping all over the common code for these use cases is uncool.
> Please only merge any of this if it can be done _cleanly_.

I have sent the first part in mailing list. Please have a look and
feed back. Your (all subscribers of busybox@) input would be valueable
for me to update the rest.
-- 
Duy