[RFC] libm replacement for Busybox

[Loïc Grenié]

2008/10/21 Rob Landley <rob at landley.net>:
> Has anyone ever actually _needed_ to statically link libm but leave libc
> dynamically linked?  Anyone?

     I've not needed it. I've libc on the (Debian/Ubuntu) ramdisk because some
  programs on the ramdisk are dynamically linked and I've compiled busybox
  with "nearly everything on" (I hate when I have a problem not having the
  tools to understand it) so I need libm as well but for this single program.
  I'm ready to think that this is a pathological case (I'm ready to
think that *I*
  am pathological, if need be).

       Thanks,

          Loïc