[RFC] libm replacement for Busybox

[Rob Landley]

On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:29:26 walter harms wrote:
> > I liked simple.
>
> i do not understand. we all like the "simple" stuff else we would write
> bloaty-clicky-bunty stuff that needs 3GHz just to start.
>
> Sometimes people post ideas that do not fit exactly into busysbox (like
> this libm stuff). It is a valid idea. it is a good idea.

Ah, I misunderstood.  I thought the proposal was to copy libm functions into 
libbb so busybox wouldn't need as much out of libc, which struck me as a road 
to reimplementing the whole of libc in busybox.

Rob