udhcpc uses 100% cpu

[Denis Vlasenko]

On Thursday 24 May 2007 14:28, William Thompson wrote:
> > Adding error check is trivial. But maybe we can use pipe instead of socket 
> > pair?
> > Can you test the following - just replace signalpipe.c with the following 
> > code
> > (// marks disabled code, non-indented lines is added code, the rest is
> > unchaged):
> 
> My test case works fine.  I appreciate your assistance with the 2 problems
> I've had.
> 
> Here's the diff between the two:

Applied to svn, thanks!
--
vda