hush on NONMMU for active shell

[Mike Frysinger]

On Saturday 02 June 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:36:30PM +0200, Martinb_ARM_NOMMU_KISSDVD wrote:
> >Because lash is the only shell what works for me (telnet shell) and hush
> > is now almost as small as lash im trying to get hush working for telnet
> > shell
> >
> >but like all other versions its not working (for me)
> >Its a bit hard to debug because if i use hush i cant telnet anymore
>
> Does msh work fine for you on that box? It's supposed to..

msh works fine as a telnet shell

it is also the only shell that will work on a no-mmu platform
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20070604/5e1aca23/attachment-0002.pgp