minimal requirements for build C compiler?

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thursday 25 May 2006 23:05, Jason Schoon wrote:
> On 5/25/06, Andre <armcc2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > On Friday 19 May 2006 17:08, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > Yup.  We went to c99 in 1.1.1, when we dropped support for gcc
> > > > 2.95.
> > >
> > > not to dig up the previous thread, but you're willing to drop
> > > support for software released in 2001 (gcc-2.95.3) but not software
> > > released in 2000 (make-3.79.1) ?
> >
> > We've dropped support for software released in 2005 (gcc-3.4.4
> > targetting ARM), so it's probably best not to try to rationalise
> > Rob's decision making process... ;-)
>
> Since this is not threaded with the previous conversation, how is ARM built
> with gcc-3.4.4 broken?  I currently use gcc-3.4.4 and may be targeting an
> ARM platform soon, so if there are issues, I would like to get them
> resolved.  Is this actually dropped support, or just a bug that exists?

ya got me ... ive been using 3.4.6 myself on arm and havent hit any problems
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20060525/0a3ed0ad/attachment-0002.pgp