svn commit: trunk/busybox: archival debianutils editors include li etc...
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Mon May 8 15:04:54 UTC 2006
On Monday 08 May 2006 4:03 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:20:39PM -0700, landley at busybox.net wrote:
> >Author: landley
> >Date: 2006-05-07 13:20:34 -0700 (Sun, 07 May 2006)
> >New Revision: 15023
> >
> >Log:
> >Remove bb_strlen() in favor of -fno-builtin-strlen. Saves as many bytes
> >as the old optimization did (actually does slightly better under gcc 4.0),
> > and simplifies the code.
> >
> >Modified: trunk/busybox/libbb/Makefile.in
> >===================================================================
> >--- trunk/busybox/libbb/Makefile.in 2006-05-07 19:26:53 UTC (rev 15022)
> >+++ trunk/busybox/libbb/Makefile.in 2006-05-07 20:20:34 UTC (rev 15023)
> >@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
> > $(compile.c) -DL_$(notdir $*)
> >
> > LIBBB_MSRC6:=$(srcdir)/llist.c
> >-LIBBB_MOBJ6:=llist_add_to.o llist_add_to_end.o llist_free_one.o
> > llist_free.o +LIBBB_MOBJ6:=llist_add_to.o llist_add_to_end.o llist_pop.o
> > llist_free.o
>
> wrong/incomplete/unrelated change.
>
> This was apparently never even compile-tested..
Actually it builds in my tree just fine because I have the rest of the llist_t
changes which I _thought_ I'd already checked in. Sigh.
I'll check in a cleanup patch and then check in the llist_t stuff on top of it
(so I'm about to revert that line and then check it right back in, but it
gives people a testing point to keep the changes separate)...
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list