svn commit: trunk/busybox: coreutils include

[Rob Landley]

On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:22 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 07 May 2006 22:12, Jason Schoon wrote:
> > Here is where my suggestion starts.  Why don't we add udhcp back into the
> > tree
>
> done
> -mike

Hang on, is this a clone?  (It's hard to tell from the commit message.)  If 
it's a clone, life is good.  I'll discard what I've done and start cleaning 
up this.

If it's the darn symlink back and I'm trashing the udhcp repository, and the 
maintainer gets mad at me, I'm going to be annoyed.

Rob

(I thought it was a link again because it still didn't show up in my tree and 
the comment message says "from udhcp", but the patch shows lots of lines...  
I'm not an svn expert.  Yeah, my tree is still broken, I'll give in and 
re-check-out the darn thing once I get the current pending set of patches 
checked in...)
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.