tar -p and usernames vs. uid's
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Fri May 5 20:08:03 UTC 2006
On Thursday 04 May 2006 6:56 pm, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Could anybody please take a short look at the previously posted update
> for the tar uname/gname patch and get it committed?
>
> http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-April/020789.html
Sorry, this got blocked because my copy of tar is hacked up with a modified
version of Dennis Vlasenko's write coalesce fix, which is A) much simpler, B)
doesn't work. I've been meaning to track down why. (I'm getting the padding
sizes wrong somewhere...)
Looking at the patch:
Sigh, more #ifdefs. But it's an area of the code that's full of 'em already,
so I'll clean it up later.
This adds a seemingly unrelated malloc. Was that a bug, or just for symmetry,
or...?
On the whole, seems reasonable. I'll try to get it in this evening, which
means I've got to go debug the tar patch, _after_ I get the llist_t changes
checked in, which were a spin-off from the sed.c global coalescing brought up
in the earlier message today, which reminds me that the sed rewrite for
proper null handling is still languishing in the previous tree...
Right...
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list