tar -p and usernames vs. uid's

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Fri May 5 20:08:03 UTC 2006


On Thursday 04 May 2006 6:56 pm, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Could anybody please take a short look at the previously posted update
> for the tar uname/gname patch and get it committed?
>
> http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-April/020789.html

Sorry, this got blocked because my copy of tar is hacked up with a modified 
version of Dennis Vlasenko's write coalesce fix, which is A) much simpler, B) 
doesn't work.  I've been meaning to track down why.  (I'm getting the padding 
sizes wrong somewhere...)

Looking at the patch:

Sigh, more #ifdefs.  But it's an area of the code that's full of 'em already, 
so I'll clean it up later.

This adds a seemingly unrelated malloc.  Was that a bug, or just for symmetry, 
or...?

On the whole, seems reasonable.  I'll try to get it in this evening, which 
means I've got to go debug the tar patch, _after_ I get the llist_t changes 
checked in, which were a spin-off from the sed.c global coalescing brought up 
in the earlier message today, which reminds me that the sed rewrite for 
proper null handling is still languishing in the previous tree...

Right...

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.



More information about the busybox mailing list