Problem building BB 1.2 daemons for uClinux ARM

[Ian Oliver]

In article <200608281315.34743.rob at landley.net>, Rob Landley wrote:
> Lash is what's broken here, not telnet.  I can reproduce this problem in 
> another context (trying to run lash from pid 1 with stdin/stdout going 
> to /dev/console, it does NOT want to execute a script I feed it), and should 
> get around to debugging that in the next day or two.

A fix that gets Control-C etc. working with lash would be great. I get similar 
(but perhaps different) results with hush, but I was planning on only using this 
for running scripts.

I'm more than happy to try putting any patches back into the lash.c in my 1.2.0 
source and to test it with telnetd under Linux. (The latter has a mild patch to 
get it to use vfork but is otherwise unchanged once I roll back the O_NOCTTY 
change.)

> Yeah, I've got to fix up the current shells even though I'd rather be working 
> on bbsh

Roll on bbsh!  The current mess of shells, all of which have very different 
features, source, and levels of viability with uClinux, is rather bewildering.

Regards

Ian