Releasing 1.02 and 1.1-pre1.

[Manuel Novoa III]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:04:04PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 03:53, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:35:33 -0500 Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> > > If anybody would like to weigh in on this, feel free. :)  I'm going to
> > > try to  cut the 1.0.2 release next week, and 1.1-pre1 should go out
> > > the week after  that.  So if you have pending features you want to go
> > > into 1.1, or a lost  patch we've forgotten about (and there have been
> > > plenty) now would be the  time to bring them up. :)
> >
> > I have never received any feedback on urunlevel
> > <http://urunlevel.sourceforge.net/>.  How about someone give me a quick
> > yea or nay on whether to include it as an official part of busybox, or
> > leave it is a separate patch like it is now?
> >
> > To be quickly followed up by "it sucks and it's too big" in a separate
> > message.
> 
> While I want to improve init (and give it a config option to understand 
> runlevels), a project to implement init scripts in C seems to me to defeat 
> the purpose of init scripts.

I can think of situations where I might want busybox on an embedded
system but NOT want a shell or any other script interpreter available.

Manuel