CONFIG_* defines

[Rob Landley]

On Tuesday 06 September 2005 12:01, Vladimir N. Oleynik wrote:
> Bernhard,
>
> > regarding that 3). Can you please explain that a little bit?
> >
> >
> > We could just move the CONFIG_* namespace to something different,
> > for example BUSYBOX_APPLET_* and BUSYBOX_APPLET_*_{FOO,BAZ,...}
> > I know that the cons -- several patches in the bugtracker may not apply
> > cleanly any more etc. -- were already brought up..
> >
> > Just as an example, i'm attaching an applet runlevel(8). The only thing
> > which would need to be touched would be bbconfig for it to allow
> > BUSYBOX_* along the by then old/legacy CONFIG_* entries in .config.
>
> Why BUSYBOX_APPLET_NAME?
> I think, best is
> CONFIG_APPLETNAME, APPLET_FEATURE_NAME, BB_FEATURE_NAME.

I remind you again of the existence of the ENABLE_ stuff.

Rob