here is setterm and a gratituos question

[Tito]

On Sunday 04 September 2005 21:56, Lord Sidiuz wrote:

snip 

> what i have in mind is something like:
> 
> while ( (opt = my_get_opt( argc, argv )) != -1 ) {
> 
>        switch ( opt ){
> 
>        case 215: //this is total for 'f'+'o'+'r'+'e'+'g'+'r'+'o'+'u'+'n'+'d'
>                     i++ ;
>                     loco= i+j ;
>                      gnsdkgn;
>                      sfdhfht();
>                      etc;
> 
>        case 232: //this is total for 'b'+'a'+'c'+'k'+'g'+'r'+'o'+'u'+'n'+'d'
>                     i++ ;
>                     loco= i+j ;
>                      gnsdkgn;
>                      sfdhfht();
>                      etc;
>        }
> 
> }
> 
> i don't like to compare two strings so this does the same job but no
> strings are declared for compare later and i think is more eficient.
> 
> but this has some bad things, i think it is not portable, it depends
> on the machine using ascii and two strings can have the same total
> 
> what's your opinion??

Hi,
take a look at the comments in:
/busybox/libbb/getopt_ulflags.c

Ciao,
Tito