[re]Bug in busybox base applet?

[Bernd Petrovitsch]

On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 09:18 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 05:56, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 06:10 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Thursday 01 September 2005 04:04, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > > > I can imagine that there are situations where you do not want (or able)
> > > > to install tens of sym-links (and just use shell functions) just have
> > > > one binary named "busybox".
> > > > I just can't get a good example together.
> > >
> > > A) Isn't this what the standalone shell is for?
> >
> > Then I don't need busybox anyway.
> 
> So you're going to use busybox's standalone shell mode without using busybox?  
> How does that work, exactly?

Sorry, I didn't knew that busybox has a standalone shell applet now - I
thought and meant sash as on http://www.tip.net.au/~dbell/.

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services