cpio: need to fix this
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Thu Sep 1 22:51:48 UTC 2005
On Thursday 01 September 2005 10:19, Charles C. Bennett, Jr. wrote:
> Hi Rob -
>
> The thing that was there didn't do anything except throw up it's hands
> and give up.
>
> Let me put together some analysis to show you what this will actually
> cost you. Note that it's quite a bit tighter than what exists in the
> GNU cpio code to solve the same problem.
I can certainly believe that. :)
I'm not against it, and I'd love to see the analysis. Mostly I'm thinking
this is big enough that it should probably have its own CONFIG_FEATURE to
chop it out for those who don't need it.
I'm also curious if there's a way to put it into the shared archive
infrastructure, although my one look at the shared archive infrastructure so
far involved me making up a patch to delete two files that had no reason to
exist. (And I may just go ahead and apply that if nobody comments on it for
long enough. That's the easy way to get feedback... :)
Rob
More information about the busybox
mailing list