setterm, without settleds

[Rob Landley]

On Friday 30 September 2005 18:07, Alastor "CrazyEyes" Santamaria wrote:
> Finnaly, it's working, it doesn't have the setleds thing because it
> didn't worked,
> the terminal ended really weird and only reset turn it back to normal.
>
> does anyonem has problems if I use ioctl's ? because that's what the
> real setleds use. spite the man page sais ioctl's can change witout
> warning.
>
> but is not a real issue for me, maybe I just use gnu setleds because
> it doesn't use ncurses like setterm, (that was the reason I coded this
> setterm in the first place).
>
> ok, opinions will be apreciated.
> come on, critics to, don't be shy.

Using ioctl is fine, but if the busybox setterm implementation doesn't do 
setleds we'll live. :)

Rob