mark obsolete usage of fold
Peter S. Mazinger
ps.m at gmx.net
Mon Dec 12 07:30:23 UTC 2005
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, John Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:26:10 +0100 (CET), Peter S Mazinger
> <ps.m at gmx.net> wrote:
> >> Since an extern __progname is already available, changing error.c to
> >> output the basename of __progname gets the coreutils tests working
> >> right. Otherwise, many of them fail due to the simple fact that the
> >> tests expect to see the program name in the output.
> >You understood/reacted wrong imho. uClibc does not want to be GNU
> >compliant. it tries only to be SuSv3 compliant. There are no GNU
> >extensions expected to be added (ask Erik, he may decide otherwise), those
> >being already there are probably because w/o them you can't really use
> >uClibc in real world.
> If your "real world" includes GNU coreutils tests, uclibc is not
> >Come up w/ a patch that is option guarded (CONFIG_GNU_COMPAT?)
> Printing the program name in the error.c message is a trivial change,
> hardly an "extension." But it makes a big difference if you want to
> run coreutils tests.
> >I can imagine it either be added, or begin putting proposed stuff
> >somewhere into the repository.
> I've solved the problem for myself, so I'll just maintain my own
> patches, and the uclibc devs can stay in their comfort zone.
Keep it secret then
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
More information about the busybox