[buildroot] $(STRIP) --strip-unneeded on a SHARED library...WHY?
John Z. Bohach
jzb at aexorsyst.com
Tue Dec 6 18:48:59 UTC 2005
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 10:10, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:44:56AM -0500, Paul Fox wrote:
> > > > -$(STRIP) --strip-unneeded $(TARGET_DIR)/lib/libdb*so*
> > > >
> > > > which is not fine, because all symbol information from the libraries
> > > > is now removed, and whenever a linker tries linking against thusly
> > > > stripped libraries, you get "undefined symbol..." errors.
> > >
> > > cant say ive had this issue before and as solar pointed out, we've
> > > been using --strip-unneeded on *all* shared libraries for quite a long
> > > time now without any linking issues
> >
> > we use --strip-unneeded too, and it's fine. but it's fine for
> > runtime. is it perhaps the case that libraries stripped like
> > that can no longer be used in development?
>
> no, because we're using it in Gentoo
>
> that means every single Gentoo user has every single shared library
> stripped with --strip-unneeded
>
> i have yet to see a bug reported where someone was unable to link
> against a library ... and since it's Gentoo, everytime a package is
> installed, it's compiled and linked on every system
> -mike
Can't speak to gentoo, but I can tell you what I've observed myself when
trying to build buildroot in a development environment built by buildroot.
Once I commented out the 'strip'-ing of ncurses, berkelydb, etc., things like
perl, 'make menuconfig' of buildroot itself, etc. all work. Otherwise,
"undefined symbol ..." error. LFS chapter 5 comments on stripping static
libraries:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/stripping.html
says don't do it.
and also in Ch.6 it comments on --strip-all on all libraries:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/strippingagain.html
and specifically does '--strip-debug' on the libraries instead. Looking
closely, however, there is no reference to 'strip-unneeded' on the libraries
themselves (just binaries).
This, combined with my own observed behavior, leads me to believe that the
--strip-unneeded option on shared libraries is the root cause of the
'undefined symbol...' errors when linking against the shared libraries.
I guess its possible that somehow the --strip-unneeded option to strip is
broken under buildroot, but it doesn't seem likely. I run:
$ nm libdb-4.3.so
and get:
nm: libdb-4.3.so: no symbols
after its been '--strip-unneeded'-ed. Seems like the right root cause, unless
'strip' is broken?!
If I run 'nm' on a not '--strip-unneeded'-ed version of libdb, or any other
library, I get all the symbols, and linking is fine. Otherwise, link-time
'undefined symbol' errors.
So if nobody else sees this behavior, then I'm really confused...
Could someone else please try a 'strip --strip-unneeded' on a lib*.so, and
see if you can still link against it afterwards, and what 'nm lib*.so'
produces? Is this unique to buildroot devel. envs. only?
(P.S.: I ran all this natively in a devel. env. created by buildroot...)
--john
More information about the busybox
mailing list