[BusyBox] What does it mean when I find bugs in the standard mount?
rob at landley.net
Thu Aug 4 09:12:53 UTC 2005
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 14:45, Tito wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 10:31, Rob Landley wrote:
> > So I'm testing the behavior of my mount against the util-linux mount in
> > ubuntu, and guess what? The util-linux mount goes _nuts_ in some obvious
> > corner cases. Try this:
> > That last command umounts "ram" and "move", even though A) it wasn't
> > asked to, B) there's nothing mounted on bind. It did this because
> > "/etc/mtab" got confused. This is another reason to just symlink that to
> > /proc/filesystems
The downside of posting at 5 am after an all-night hacking session.
Yes, obviously. :)
More information about the busybox