[BusyBox] What does it mean when I find bugs in the standard mount?
farmatito at tiscali.it
Tue Aug 2 19:45:49 UTC 2005
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 10:31, Rob Landley wrote:
> So I'm testing the behavior of my mount against the util-linux mount in
> ubuntu, and guess what? The util-linux mount goes _nuts_ in some obvious
> corner cases. Try this:
> That last command umounts "ram" and "move", even though A) it wasn't asked to,
> B) there's nothing mounted on bind. It did this because "/etc/mtab" got
> confused. This is another reason to just symlink that to /proc/filesystems
> (which my rewrite makes work very very well, thanks. Including with loopback
> Right: _my_ version works properly, which is all I'm focusing on at present...
> Still working on it. I'll post wherever I get to before stopping for the
> night (morning, or possibly early afternoon by that point with enough
> caffeine), even if it's not actually quite done yet...
More information about the busybox