[BusyBox] Re: lazy unmount
rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Mon Aug 1 18:33:43 UTC 2005
On 7/30/05, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> Yes, and that's what's holding up the checkin. (The mount part was done a
> while ago...)
Where can i find it?
> I'm ripping out -l for freeing loop devices; it should now autodetect this.
What do you plan to change in the unmout? If there isn't going to be a
lock to prevent the races you describe then it seems to me that umount
will remain quite simple. Is that the case?
Maybe I can help with the rewrite. The sooner it is in the svn, the
sooner gentoo will get it and the sooner I can drop my local patch :)
> Anyway: yeah, -l is becoming lazy unmount. I'm working on it...
Thank you very much,
More information about the busybox