[BusyBox] Re: Bug on route.c
Pigi
pigi at frumar.it
Sat Mar 20 00:00:08 UTC 2004
> No... the bug was in both ipv4 and ipv6 processing.
I was focused only on ipv4. My fault
.
> Also, it is better to simply access args[-1] directly in the problem case
> (which is where the global replace comes in). Your approach adds
> unnecessary code.
The most important thing is to have found the bug so busybox start to
works again. I'm not (yet) in the philosopy of the microprogram :(
> Thanks for reporting the problem.
Glad to have been useful.
Pigi
More information about the busybox
mailing list