shfs over ssh (was Re: [BusyBox] Scriptable telnet?)

[Friedrich Lobenstock]

Csaba Henk wrote on 11.01.2004 15:02 MET:
> 
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Rob Landley wrote:
> 
>>On Tuesday 06 January 2004 05:50, Csaba Henk wrote:
>>
>>>The situation is that I want to script a telnet session. The best beast
>>>for communicating with a telnet server is a telnet client, ain't it? Using
>>>nc would mean writing a telnet client in shell... that's not what I want.
>>
>>I don't think so.  What are you trying to do?
> 
> 
> I want to make shfs (
> 
> http://shfs.sourceforge.net
> 
>  -- it is a shell based network filesystem) work with busybox as mounter
> and/or host. Currenlty shfs may use ssh and rsh for getting a remote
> shell. As busybox has client+server only for telnet, I thought the
> best/funniest solution would be porting shfs to telnet.

Have you tried to use dropbear as ssh daemon?
See http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/dropbear.html

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock