[BusyBox] gcc problem in editor/sed.c

[Rob Landley]

On Friday 10 October 2003 03:01, Steven Scholz wrote:
> Rob,
>
> > Possibly what's different about your cross tool chain is gcc is getting
> > different arguments.  Are you feeding it the -ansi or -pedantic switches,
> > perhaps?
>
> I actually do get the same when _not_ cross compiling but using host gcc
> 2.95.3!
>
> Steven

By default, gcc 2.95 apparently doesn't allow c++ extensions in C.  I just 
chrooted into an environment that had it and compiled the following.  
Compiling "gcc blah.c" it barfed.  But renamed blah.C (which indicates C++, I 
believe), it took it.

gcc 3.2.2 took it even as "blah.c", it is indeed a change in gcc behavior with 
the new version...

Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blah.C
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 114 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20031010/5c7e398b/attachment.cc