[BusyBox] off topic: 'device table support' for mkcramfs?

[Jonas Holmberg]

> I don't do include- or ignore-, since I manage that type of thing
> elsewhere.  I don't really see that as a problem for mkfs* to be
> worrying about.  If you don't want stuff in your filesystem,
> don't put it in the directory and it won't be added...

OK, I see now that they work about the same way. And I guess that our install could be changed to handle one central device_table file instead of one metafile per dir also. But the ability to ignore files comes in handy, at least for us as we install tons of libs in /lib (sometimes we use glibc...) and decide which should actually go in the final image after all applications have been installed.

/Jonas