[BusyBox] Building uname...

[Thomas Cameron]

Hello,
    So, basically, this would point to the compiler optimizing the code
improperly.  Does anyone else use optimizations, and have a working
uname?  What about other configuration items.  For instance, I have
compiled uClibc to use PIC code, etc.  Could that effect it also?  I
wouldn't think so...but who knows.  Stranger anomolies have happened.
Anyway, let me (us) know if you can successfully compile uname.o with
-Os, or some other optimization level.  Please include your GCC version,
and all other relevant information.  Hopefully we can track this down
easily.
    One other thing.  When did uname.o change last?  I will check the
CVSWeb, and look at the differences.  I know that it _did_ work at one
point, because I've used it in the past.  Thanks in advance!
 
Thomas Cameron
CEI Systems
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Edmund Troche 
	Sent: Sun 3/24/2002 6:49 AM 
	To: Thomas Cameron 
	Cc: busybox at busybox.net 
	Subject: Re: [BusyBox] Building uname...
	
	
	 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4130 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20020324/23d6a9bc/attachment-0001.bin