[BusyBox] Re: Non-CONFIG options

[Robert Schwebel]

Tim, 

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 01:15:53AM -0700, Tim Riker wrote:
> Seems to me that you should be adding a prefix all the time to each 
> package and removing to avoid any name clashes. Surely you would not be 
> able to get the upstream maintainers to resolve all those you find.

It seems like that. My original idea was to have shorter names, but I
have the impression that it is not really possible any more. However,
the problem will be that not only the "config FOO"s have to be replaced
but also the "depends on FOO"s. This smells like becoming much more
complicated than my one-line-sed-script which was used before. 

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Braunschweiger Str. 79,  31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4