[BusyBox] New patches

[Mark Whitley]

On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:46:09PM -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> > This looks identical to the patch of yours that I committed just a minute
> > ago.
> 
> It may have been.  I had a different patch wandering around my system, so I
> wanted to make sure I had the right one there for you all to use.

Just to make us all feel better, next time you get a chance, please
double-check the patch I checked in to CVS and make sure everything is
okay.


[re: ls -A auto patch]

> > I was able to break Erik away from his work for just a minute and got the
> > official response from him: This patch makes busybox behave differently
> > than GNU ls so it will not be applied.
> 
> :P
> 
> Looks like I get to keep my patch..... whatever happened to the env patch?

Which one? There was a whole slurry of changes committed that affected
environment variables before 0.50 was released.

> I didn't do that one, but it sounds just useful enough to be included...
> maybe?

Maybe. If there's a (wishlist) bug open for it, you're welcome to add a
comment to it voicing your support for it.

> I scanned through the list archives and I can't find it...

Welcome to my world. You know how I'm always harping on people to use the
bug-tracking system if they don't want it to get lost? Now you know why...


Cheers,


Mark Whitley
markw at lineo.com