[BusyBox] Syslogd
Gennady Feldman
gena01 at cachier.com
Tue Mar 6 23:28:52 UTC 2001
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Erik Andersen wrote:
> Yes absolutely. I've been very unhappy with myself for glomming those two apps
> together. They really should be seperated.
>
> If we make the syslog client code into library code in utility.c (soon to be
> libbusybox) then we can have a separate klogd.c file and both klogd.c and
> logger.c can use the same underlying syslog client code. That will result
> in a much cleaner architecture.
>
> -Erik
>
Here is my current TODO list for busybox:
1. Split up klogd and syslogd into 2 separate applets.
2. Add syslog_msg() to utility.c
3. Update klogd.c w/ new function call
4. Update logger.c to do the same as #3
5. Remove all the garbage from syslogd (there is a lot of code in there)
6. In syslogd fix up/cleanup the code and add suppression of duplicate
messages. (a TODO item added by me a long time ago)
P.S. What is the tentative schedule for the next release. I don't want
everybody to wait until I am done.
G.F.
More information about the busybox
mailing list