[BusyBox] Why is it so bad...?
Erik Andersen
andersen at lineo.com
Mon Jan 22 20:36:38 UTC 2001
On Mon Jan 22, 2001 at 03:20:35PM -0500, Tom Cameron wrote:
> Erik,
> So does that mean that -O3 will enlarge the size of the final
> product due to enabling loop unrolling and inline functions, or am I
> misunderstanding what they are? Thank you for your response, as my man
> pages don't have the -Os optimization rule in them (possibly an older
> version of the compiler, as the base system I'm assembling my busybox-based
> system on is Mandrake 7.0). Again, thanks for all your help!
Yes. -O3 code will be slightly faster and slightly larger. For the smallest
possible code, always use -Os if available. An easy way to test is to grab
busybox, and try to compile it. It tests and uses -Os if this option is
present.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen email: andersen at lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the busybox
mailing list