[BusyBox] tar and getopt (again)
Erik Andersen
andersen at lineo.com
Mon Jan 22 19:57:52 UTC 2001
On Mon Jan 22, 2001 at 11:01:49AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:52:27PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > On Sun Jan 21, 2001 at 10:19:27PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > > The attached patch makes tar use getopt. It does so by using a
> > > cheap trick I learned from reading GNU tar. That is, if the first
> > > parameter is missing a leading -, add it. Hehe. The patch is
> > > large since most of the option parsing was reindented. It saves
> > > 16 bytes. OK to commit?
> >
> [snip request not to use getopt_long]
>
> Though avoiding getopt_long is possible, it is so gross that I'd
> rather write getopt_long for uC-libc than be stuck without it. In
> order for things to work (as far as I can tell), you'd need to
> check for the argument (which getopt_long would handle for you),
> and then need to do some major hackery with argv and argc to skip
> the rest of the exclude...if it is even possible. I guess I'll
> take a look at writing a getopt_long replacement, unless someone
> convinces me otherwise.
k. Ckeck it in as is. uClibc already has a getopt_long -- the main reason I
was looking at it is that since so few busybox apps use it, I was hoping to
save space by not using it. It saves space on a static compile, since the
getopt_long code wouldn't get linked in, and it saves a (admittedly tiny) bit
of space on a dynamic build, since the ELF vector code to fixup the external
symbol isn't needed. Not that big a deal. Just a thought.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen email: andersen at lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the busybox
mailing list