[git commit] awk: fix printf %%
Denys Vlasenko
vda.linux at googlemail.com
Sun Sep 5 01:42:51 UTC 2021
commit: https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=7d06d6e18651cb183a3723fa21ef62935ea08647
branch: https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=refs/heads/master
A refactor of the awk printf code in
e2e3802987266c98df0efdf40ad5da4b07df0113
appears to have broken the printf interpretation of two percent signs,
which normally outputs only one percent sign.
The patch below brings busybox awk printf behavior back into alignment
with the pre-e2e380 behavior, the busybox printf util, and other common
(awk and non-awk) printf implementations.
function old new delta
awk_printf 626 672 +46
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thau <danthau at bedrocklinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux at googlemail.com>
---
editors/awk.c | 9 ++++++++-
testsuite/awk.tests | 6 ++++++
testsuite/printf.tests | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/editors/awk.c b/editors/awk.c
index 3adbca7aa..f7b8ef0d3 100644
--- a/editors/awk.c
+++ b/editors/awk.c
@@ -2346,8 +2346,15 @@ static char *awk_printf(node *n, size_t *len)
size_t slen;
s = f;
- while (*f && (*f != '%' || *++f == '%'))
+ while (*f && *f != '%')
f++;
+ c = *++f;
+ if (c == '%') { /* double % */
+ slen = f - s;
+ s = xstrndup(s, slen);
+ f++;
+ goto tail;
+ }
while (*f && !isalpha(*f)) {
if (*f == '*')
syntax_error("%*x formats are not supported");
diff --git a/testsuite/awk.tests b/testsuite/awk.tests
index dc2ae2e11..bcaafe8fd 100755
--- a/testsuite/awk.tests
+++ b/testsuite/awk.tests
@@ -463,4 +463,10 @@ testing "awk \"cmd\" | getline" \
"HELLO\n" \
'' ''
+# printf %% should print one % (had a bug where it didn't)
+testing 'awk printf %% prints one %' \
+ "awk 'BEGIN { printf \"%%\n\" }'" \
+ "%\n" \
+ '' ''
+
exit $FAILCOUNT
diff --git a/testsuite/printf.tests b/testsuite/printf.tests
index 34a65926e..050edef71 100755
--- a/testsuite/printf.tests
+++ b/testsuite/printf.tests
@@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ testing "printf understands %Ld" \
"-5\n""0\n" \
"" ""
+testing "printf understands %%" \
+ "${bb}printf '%%\n' 2>&1; echo \$?" \
+ "%\n""0\n" \
+ "" ""
+
testing "printf handles positive numbers for %d" \
"${bb}printf '%d\n' 3 +3 ' 3' ' +3' 2>&1; echo \$?" \
"3\n"\
More information about the busybox-cvs
mailing list