[BusyBox-cvs] busybox/procps top.c,1.11,1.12

[Erik Andersen]

Update of /var/cvs/busybox/procps
In directory nail:/tmp/cvs-serv15466/procps

Modified Files:
	top.c 
Log Message:
Larry Doolittle writes:

This is a bulk spelling fix patch against busybox-1.00-pre10.
If anyone gets a corrupted copy (and cares), let me know and
I will make alternate arrangements.

Erik - please apply.

Authors - please check that I didn't corrupt any meaning.

Package importers - see if any of these changes should be
passed to the upstream authors.

I glossed over lots of sloppy capitalizations, missing apostrophes,
mixed American/British spellings, and German-style compound words.

What is "pretect redefined for test" in cmdedit.c?

Good luck on the 1.00 release!

      - Larry



Index: top.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/busybox/procps/top.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -d -r1.11 -r1.12
--- a/top.c	15 Mar 2004 08:29:04 -0000	1.11
+++ b/top.c	14 Apr 2004 17:51:28 -0000	1.12
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
  *
  * (C) Eero Tamminen <oak at welho dot com>
  *
- * Rewroted by Vladimir Oleynik (C) 2002 <dzo at simtreas.ru>
+ * Rewritten by Vladimir Oleynik (C) 2002 <dzo at simtreas.ru>
  */
 
 /* Original code Copyrights */
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
  * is the kernel clock tick rate. One of these units is called a jiffy.
  * The HZ value used in the kernel may vary according to hacker desire.
  * According to Linus Torvalds, this is not true. He considers the values
- * in /proc as being in architecture-dependant units that have no relation
+ * in /proc as being in architecture-dependent units that have no relation
  * to the kernel clock tick rate. Examination of the kernel source code
  * reveals that opinion as wishful thinking.
  *