[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/arptables: bump to version 0.0.5
arnout at mind.be
Thu Dec 5 23:51:40 UTC 2019
On 05/12/2019 23:00, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> +Yann, Arnout, Peter in Cc.
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 20:11:44 +0100
> Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/package/arptables/Config.in b/package/arptables/Config.in
>> index 873e791e81..aeb7250a72 100644
>> --- a/package/arptables/Config.in
>> +++ b/package/arptables/Config.in
>> @@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
>> config BR2_PACKAGE_ARPTABLES
>> - bool "arptables"
>> + bool "arptables-legacy"
> We normally want to have the package Config.in option name match the
> package name, which would no longer be the case here.
>> depends on BR2_USE_MMU # needs fork()
>> - Tool to set up, maintain, and inspect the tables of ARP rules.
>> + Legacy tool to set up, maintain, and inspect the tables of ARP
>> + rules.
>> - http://ebtables.sourceforge.net
>> + A more uptodate client of the arptables tool is provided in
>> + the iptables package. The new tool was formerly known as
>> + arptables-compat.
> Arnout, Peter, Yann, considering the change to the package, does it
> make sense to rename it entirely to arptables-legacy ? Or should we
> take Fabrice's approach, i.e keep the package name as-is, and just as
> an exception change the option prompt ?
I think going to the whole rename and legacy dance is a but too much for a
simple change like this. So I'd apply Fabrice's patch as is.
More information about the buildroot