[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] package/tegrarcm: select host-cryptopp and drop BR2_arm dependency
thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com
Wed Dec 12 08:46:47 UTC 2018
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:56:05 -0200, Carlos Santos wrote:
> - It is not be strictly necessary to select host-cryptopp but let's do
> it like other host packages do.
> - There is no reason to depend on the target architecture, since it's a
> host tool.
> Yes, we could have separate commits to select host-cryptopp and drop
> BR2_arm dependency but that would be overkill.
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos <casantos at datacom.com.br>
> package/tegrarcm/Config.in.host | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/package/tegrarcm/Config.in.host b/package/tegrarcm/Config.in.host
> index d8cbb947d6..3411501a72 100644
> --- a/package/tegrarcm/Config.in.host
> +++ b/package/tegrarcm/Config.in.host
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_TEGRARCM
> bool "host tegrarcm"
> - depends on BR2_arm || BR2_armeb
The idea of this dependency is that since tegracrm is only useful in
conjunction with a Tegra-based system, there is not reason to build it
if the target isn't ARM.
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_CRYPTOPP
So we are starting to add Config.in.host options for all packages ? Why
are you doing this change ? What is the motivation ?
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
More information about the buildroot